this bridge we call home (1)

This Bridge We Call Home: Radical Visions for Transformation, Gloria Anzaldua & AnaLouise Keating (Editors), Routledge, 2002.

Reading assignment for Monday, April 9, 2012.  Your reply (under Comments) is due before class. Your response should demonstrate you’ve done and thought about both of the readings. Be sure to check and make sure your response posts.

Chela Sandoval, “After Bridge: Technologies of Crossing” (From this bridge we call home 21-26), Evelyn Alsultany, “Los Intersticios: Recasting Moving Selves” (From this bridge we call home 106-110), Jid Lee “The Cry-Smile Mask: A Korean American Woman’s System of Resistance” (From this bridge we call home 397-402).

Readings: Emma Pérez and Mónica Palacios

Reading assignment for Monday, March 26, 2012. Emma Pérez, “Irigaray’s Female Symbolic in the Making of Chicana Lesbian Sitios y Lenguas (Sites and Discourses)” and Mónica Palacios “Tomboy” (both from Living Chicana Theory)

Your reply (under Comments) is due before class. Your response should demonstrate you’ve done and thought about the readings. Be sure to check and make sure your response posts.

Poli Marichal : exceptional “Chicana”

Within the scope of Chicano and Chicana art exists the idea of dissimilation: the breaking down of this particular genre of art by including art that contrasts or creates exceptions. The artist and film maker, Poli Marichal fits perfectly into this subject. Primarily a print-maker, her work has been included in several Chicana/o art collectives with pieces that express social, and environmental concerns, as well as visions of the human condition. One of the things that makes her exceptional is the fact that she is neither Mexican nor of Mexican descent but is still included in the genre of Chican/o art.

Intruder
Poli Marichal, 2009

Poli Marichal was born in Ponce, Puerto Rico, where she earned a B.A. in printmaking at Escuela de Artes Plásticas de Puerto Rico, and later an MFA at the Massachusetts College of Art. Marichal often delves into the ideas of immigration and family roots. In the painted piece, “Intruder” (2009), the cactus represents the southern immigrant who breaks through the groundwork of it’s new environment as it grows and makes it’s new home. Many of her pieces are known for including trees as symbols. She states that they represent the need for individuals to feel rooted and “safe” while at the same time transcending these needs with others and attempting to branch out “into the cosmos.”
Her most recent projects include animated shorts, both personal and public, and a permanent mural found in LA. The mural, installed on a wall at Avenue 50 studio gallery is comprised of carved wooden panels. Made in 2007, Marichal directed the high school and college students that created the piece for the non-profit organization, LA Commons.
    As Gloria Anzaldúa mentions in her book, Borderlands, feminism is a subject that reaches multiple races, cultures, and geographies. That third-world feminism is a specific type of feminism is true and can result in a type of sisterhood, as exemplified by Marichal’s work and contributions to both the Puerto Rican community and the Chicano community.

Additional Sources:

http://www.polimarichal.com

http://www.artslant.com/global/artists/show/4155-poli-marichal

Borderlands / La Frontera (3)

Gloria Anzaldúa, Borderlands (1-91)

Reading assignment for Monday, March 12. Your reply (under Comments) is due before class. Remember, you don’t need to answer all or even any of the questions, but your response should demonstrate you’ve done and thought about the readings. Be sure to check and make sure your response posts.

Read Borderlands / La Frontera, Chapters 5 and 7

How does language shape the self? If you have more than one language, consider the question of whether you think differently in one language versus another. Do you communicate differently in one language over another?

Anzaldúa defines what Chicano Spanish means to her. What intersections make up the different languages you speak? How does language move you between one sphere and another, home, friends, public, private? What elements make you identify a space as “home” or “family”?

Define the mestiza consciousness. How is it specific to Anzaldúa? How can it be used universally? How does Anzaldúa define machismo? How is that definition the same as those we’ve read earlier in the class? How is it the same?

How does Anzaldúa connect her theory of consciousness with white culture? What is her position with regard to the intersections of different groups? How does this consciousness related to space / land?

Borderland / La Frontera (2)

Gloria Anzaldúa, Borderlands (1-91)

Reading assignment for Friday, March 9. Your reply (under Comments) is due before class. Remember, you don’t need to answer all or even any of the questions, but your response should demonstrate you’ve done and thought about the readings. Be sure to check and make sure your response posts.

Based on your reading of Borderlands and your study of Chicana feminism in this class, how would you define and construct a mestiza consciousness? What are the advantages of such a construction? What are the pitfalls?

How would you connect the theory in Borderlands to the presentation on Wednesday? How is Anzaldúa constructing the idea of the Chicana feminist self?

Aurora Guerrero, An inspirational Chicana Filmmaker



http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=g7Y6RJYQ1rk#!

Mosquita y Mari is the first feature-length film by a Chicana filmmaker debuted at the 2012 Sundance Film Festival. It is also the latest project of Aurora Guerrero, an American director, screenwriter, and producer, who also collaborated on the film Real Women Have Curves. A critically acclaimed film that catapult the career of Mexican-American actress, America Ferrera, who played Ana, a first generation Mexican-American teenager on the cusp of womanhood. Pura Lengua and Viernes Girl are other short films created due to efforts of Guerrero and a group called LA Xicana (Chicana) filmmakers. The films have been presented around the world and are a window to the current lives of young people living in Los Angeles.

In Mosquita y Mari the South East L.A. neighborhood is highlighted, a place infused with culture, history, and language. It is also the home of many Mexican American generations full of stories worthy of being shared with the world and that are important to the Chicano/a Movement. Mosquita y Mari is a coming of age story about two fifteen-year old Chicanas growing up in East Los Angeles. It captures the struggles, adventures, and journey of the two young women that display a friendship and sisterhood that transcends all color lines. The film was a collaborative effort because Guerrero involved the community into her project and really took the time to learn the history of the city and the people. It is an important film because rarely are the struggles of Latina women depicted on the big screen. This film combats the historical and political erasure of Chicanas and women of color in society and history.

Guerrero has always been interested in learning about the stories of Chicana women. At UC Berkeley she studied both psychology and Chicano studies. She later moved and fell in love with the city of Los Angeles, a very story rich environment and the birthplace of the Chicana movement. In the past Guerrero has shared that her first inspirations were writers especially, women of color feminist writers like Audre Lorde, Cherrie Moraga, Gloria Anzaldúa, Chrystos, June Jordan, and Angela Davis. She further shared in her words “when I discovered their brave works as a freshman in college, a fierce creative seed was planted in me. It was a calling I had the moment I was stripped naked by their words.” Aurora Guerrero is creating a body of knowledge that future filmmakers and Chicanas can research and also incorporate into their own works.  She is a storyteller of her own and the experiences of Chicanas, but most of all she is achieving female empowerment.

Additional Sources:

Chicana Generations (1)

Reading Assignment: Your reply (under Comments) is due before class on Wednesday, February 15. Remember, you don’t need to answer all or even any of the questions, but your response should demonstrate you’ve done and thought about the readings. Be sure to check and make sure your response posts.

  • Lorna Dee Cervantes, “Beneath the Shadow of the Freeway”
  • Angie Chabram Dernersesian “And, Yes…The Earth Did Part: On Splitting Chicana/o Subjectivity” (from Building With Our Hands, 34-56)
  • Bernice Zamora, “Notes From a Chicana Coed” (from Making Face, Making Soul)

Reading both Cervantes and Dernersesian, how do you see the images of generations in Chicana feminism?  What can each woman in Cervantes’ poem represent?  What do you associate with the poetic images of freeways and their shadows?  Do you agree with Dernersesian’s thesis that Chicana poetry / art constructs and positions multiple Chicana identities? According to Dernersesian, how do these identities relate to Rendón’s machismo / malinchismo dichotomy?

How does Zamora’s “Notes From a Chicana Coed” read along side Cervantes’s “Beneath the Shadow of the Freeway”?

Reading from Dernersesian’s article, how would you say Aztlán is split in Cervantes’ poem? How in Zamora’s?

 

Negative and Positive machismo?

Machismo is a word that was made by Anglo men to describe Latino men, but machismo can have both a negative and positive meaning to it. According to Rosalie Flores in Chicana Feminist Thought, she desribes machismo as “an elusive Mexican value, inbred and fostered by parental anxiety for the males in the family to show manliness, virility, honor, and courage…”. A Chicano man can act machismo in a positive light, like refusing to take days off of work because he puts the pressures of  paying the bills, putting food on the table, and his families well being, on his back with pride. Such machismo actions can encourage males and females of the family to have the same great work ethic in life, as well as the same selfless values.

However, the machismo mindset can be negative for a Chicano if it is used to oppress women. ow their “machismo”. The “negative” machismo mindset that some men had towards the Chicana Feminist movement  has affected the Chicana feminist movement negatively. Majority of these Chicano men who exercised the “negative” machismo believed during the Chicana Feminist movement that it was the womens duty to  cook, clean, and take care of the children, and not have a voice in the Chicano movement. Some men felt women could only have secretarial jobs during the movement, and this lead to some men greatly opposing the Chicana Feminist movement.  When some of the Chicano men start seeing their wives go against the customs that have been embedded in their minds of women just being in the background, their first instinct was to “correct” such behaviors. Some Chicano men saw women and their wives overriding  their disapproval to join the Chicana feminist movements as truly wrong.  The way some Chicano men stopped the voice of their wives was to stop them from joining  the Chicana Feminist movement because of their negative “machismo” mindset and actions.

According to Machismo-Bibliography. “A person isn’t born macho”, it is taught, which means acting machismo is taught.  Chicano..The Chicano male who is acts machismo in the wrong way is stunting the growth of Chicano people as a whole in a way. The potential great acts and ideas by Chicana women can be suppressed forever if their voice isn’t heard. The great idea or act of a Chicana women can have for the empowerment of her people could encourage other Chicano’s, male or female, to expand on her work. A perfect example is the success that the Chicana Feminist movement had on the Chicano community as a whole. Their are groups such as the brown Berets that currently allow women to have a voice in their organization and the women have successfully helped provide food, counseling, and guidance for the Chicano community. If such women were silenced by men negatively using “machismo” then their Chicano community as a whole wouldn’t have been able to positively benefit from the ideas of these Chicana women.


References:

  • Garcia, Alma M., ed. 1997. Chicana Feminist Thought: The Basic Historical Writings. Vol. 1. New York , NY : Routledge. 21-24.
  •   Garcia. 48-50.
  •    Garcia. 119.
  • Garcia. 93.
  • Garcia. 113-116
  • Mirandé, Alfredo, and Enríquez, Evangelina. 1979. La Chicana. Chicago , IL : University of Chicago Press. 12-13
  • Mirandé. 242.
  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicana_feminism

On Chicana Artists: Isis Rodriguez

Picking up on the subject of Chicana Symbols, I wanted to present one that came to mind when discussing the idea in class.

Virgen LMA
Virgen LMA (1999), Isis Rodriguez

 

Chicana Art: Isis Rodriguez – a second-generation Latina, known in the Chicana art community for her cartoon-styled pieces. Specifically her series – Little Miss Attitude (1998), depicted Chicanas and Latinas in different ways. Although she was part of the art movement that was more about personal representation as opposed to covering the broader subject of Latina women, her works navigate through adolescence in a way many girls (especially Latina girls) can relate to. But unlike Coyolxauqui, neither her or her pieces stand as major symbols for the Chicana community, instead, Isis expresses herself through the symbols. Her pieces include images of the Virgin Mary, a native girl, and a “roughneck” chola girl, among others. All images of what a (Latina) girl has been, or could be seen as.

Thus the female symbols, like those for the Chicano movement, are varied and dynamic. Chicana feminists have taken advantage of their understanding of these women and their struggles as a way to display their current struggle.

Chicana Feminism in an Unlikely Place

[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3ilElOoQQM]

Painfully, I’ll admit that writing a blog about Alice Bag’s Violence Girl has taken longer than reading the memoir itself.  I was unsure how to approach it.  In both the beginning and the end of the book, the influence of Chicano culture is obvious.  Alice Bag, born Alicia Armendariz, grew up in an ethnic East Los Angeles neighborhood, the daughter of a Mexican father and a Mexican-American mother.  At the end of her memoir, she returns to East LA to teach kindergarten, realizing that no one can gear lesson plans to immigrants and children of immigrants like a person who has shared their experience.  But what about the bulk of the book?  The large middle section, during which Alice lived in Hollywood and was a major player in the emerging punk scene of the late 1970s?  Even after reading Violence Girl, my brain still conjured up the image of punk rock as predominantly white and male.  Even though Alice’s book is full to the brim with strong, empowered women of the punk movement, to me they embodied a feminism that was distinctly Anglo and middle class.  I finally realized, however, that it was Alice’s poor, Chicano background that made her such a powerful force in the rebellious uprising of punk.

Alice grew up in a fairly typical Chicano household.  Her father did freelance construction work and her mother’s main responsibilities were to cook and clean.  Her mother, she remembers, never ate with her and her father at the table.  She stayed in the kitchen, eating only when the food was done and everyone else was served.  Her father was domineering, and ultimately quite violent.  Over any small signs of disrespect from her mother, he would beat her within an inch of her life.  From quite early on, growing up in this environment of extreme gender inequality, Alice decided that she would never grow up to live the kind of life her mother did.  Her father was the embodiment of exaggerated machismo and her mother fits perfectly in line with the Chicano Nationalist image of a woman who endures hardships for the sake of her domestic life.  Alice, in unknowing agreement with so many Chicana feminists, saw the problems inherent in this rigid definition of family life.

While beginning to formulate thoughts about Chicana oppression as a child in her own home, Alice was also beginning to understand Chicano oppression on a larger scale outside her home.  The only language spoken in her house was Spanish.  When Alice started going to school, though she was definitely not stupid, she was treated as such by unsympathetic teachers who were too lazy to help her overcome her language barrier.  If teachers are unwilling to help their students at such a young age, then students are left developmentally behind.  This handicap follows them throughout their school career, making college or white collar jobs a nearly impossible dream.  This is one of the many ways that Chicanos in America are kept down, and Alice’s realization of this lead to her later decision to be a teacher herself.  While still fairly young, Alice recalls seeing the young men and women of the Brown Berets protesting the Vietnam War.  She also recalls how quickly the peaceful protest turned into a horrifying scene of racially charged police brutality.

Like many art forms when they first emerge, punk was a challenge to the status quo.  It was youths that had always been outcasts, coming together to create a culture in which they no longer felt like outcasts.  There is, and always has been, and undercurrent of anger in punk.  Looking back on it, how can one not see that Alice Bag was the perfect punk candidate?  As she learned at the war protest, to be Chicano is to inherently challenge the status quo.  She would see that kind of police brutality mirrored at what were supposed to be peaceful (albeit chaotic) punk shows.  In these instances, Alice could understand better than most that to be outside of the dominant group is to be a target that society wants to subdue.  As one who, so young, learned the price women can pay for their subordination, her anger and her need for catharsis and her to establish a presence of strength made her a dynamic and forceful punk lead singer.

As a teenager, living in Hollywood to be close to the music scene she was entrenched in, she began to see her friends lives wrecked because of drugs.  Between heroin and loneliness, she saw people that loved take their lives and have their lives taken.  Without a doubt, I think it was her culture that spared her.  Among so many things that can be viewed in the Chicano family structure as negative, the overriding positive is the notion that family is important.  In one way or another, everyone in the family has a responsibility to each other.  Her father provided for her, her mother fed her, and she loathed the idea of ever letting them down.  They wanted her to have a better life, to rise above generations before her.  She could see that a lot of the paths her friends were winding up on were not paths that her parents would want her on, and ultimately were not paths that she herself would want to be on.  So she went back home.  She went back to school, and she reflected on all the things that pushed her to be successful, and all the things that held her back from success.  Having parents who loved her and supported her and told her she could be whatever she wanted to be pushed her; having teachers who wouldn’t spend an extra moment helping a English language learner held her back.  She saw the value in reading and writing, and this was her impetus in getting her teaching degree.  From teaching Kindergartners in East Los Angeles to teaching Nicaraguans of all ages in war torn villages, it was her Chicana culture that transformed her attitude of punk rebellion to positive revolutionary.

 

Works Cited:

Bag, Alice.  Violence Girl.  Port Townsend, WA: Feral House, 2011.  Print.