So Let’s Put Some of the Pieces Together

This is part of a longer blog series, which you can find links to the previous as well as the next blog posts at the bottom of this blog. 

I think its time I put some things into perspective and piece some of the history and blogs together.

I have complied a time line with the perspectives of the blogs but also some big events of the Chicano History.

 

1947Mendez v. Westminster Supreme Court: This case is critical to the birth of the Chicana/o  Studies program because it is the case that desegregated  schools for Mexican and Mexican American students in Orange County California School.

1968:Chicano Blowouts: Stepping stone towards establishing a formal conversation around the development and implementation of the programs as students walked out in response to the lack of an inclusive curriculum and discrimination they felt in their classrooms.

Plan de Santa Barbara: Noted as the manifesto for implementing Chicano Studies educational programs.

United Mexican-American Students (UMAS) of Loyola-Marymount Proposes a Chicano Studies Department: In a pretty hefty document the students of UMAS began to demand a Chicano Studies Department at LMU.

1970:Chicano Moratorium: An anti-Vietnam war protest that united the Chicanos under one cause, yet it went terribly wrong.

1973: Loyola Marymount University(LMU) officially merge and changes its name to what we know it as currently.

Mexican-American Studies Program proposed at LMU: Five years after UMAS proposes an immediate implementation of a Chicano Studies Program, a proposal for a Mexican-American Studies program emerges.

1974: Chicana/o Studies Department is finally borned at LMU.

Mid 1970’s:Chicana feminist get recognized in El Movimiento thus allowing the discourse of our Chicana Feminism class to occur.

2010: Governor of Arizona signs HB2281 and Tucson Unified School District disbanded Mexican American Studies.

2012: LMU’s Centennial Celebration!

The start of my Chicana/o Studies blog series.

So although this is the end of the series, it is time to recognize this would not have been possible without the help and support of Dr. Annemarie Perez, Dr. Karen Mary Davalos, Raymundo Andrade, Mahnaz Ghaznavi, and Christine Megowan and all those who laid the foundation of the department that gave birth to my interest to its history. Gracias!

Read more:

The Birth of the Chicana/o Studies DepartmentSetting the StageStudents Propose a New ProgramFrom Chicano Studies Department to Mexican- American Studies Degree ProgramCapstone Project Gone Blog

Women’s Leadership in the High School Blowouts of 1968

Education inequality has always been a common subject in the Latino community but the first time this issue was actually heard of across the country was during the 1968 East L.A. School Blowouts. These protests began in five East L.A. High Schools including Belmont, Garfield, Lincoln, Roosevelt and Wilson where the student dropout rates were about fifty percent.  The participants and supporters of the blowouts wanted to implement a bilingual and bicultural training for teachers, the elimination of tracking based on standardized tests and overall better access to a quality education. These high school walkouts were the beginning of a wave that brought about the student-ran organizations that create the main focus of the Chicano movement. Today there are plenty of articles and news stories that can be found on the Blowouts including how much has changed since then (http://articles.latimes.com/1988-03-07/local/me-488_1_lincoln-high-school-graduate). Yet, the role of women participation during these walkouts continues to be unrecognized. As Dolores Delgado Bernal mentions in “http://www.jstor.org/pss/3347162,” “their participation was vital to the Blowouts, yet because of a traditional leadership paradigm does not acknowledge the importance of those who participate in organizing, developing consciousness, and networking, their leadership remains unrecognized and unappreciated by most historians” (262).

A protest always takes a lot of planning; however this is the “behind the scenes” stage of an event that is never quite noticed. Before coming to the conclusion of a Boycott, numerous women including Tanya Luna Mount, Vicky Castro, Paula Crisostomo and Rachel Ochoa Cervera, attended and actively participated in meetings that were necessary to develop strategies from which to gather enough information of what really went on at these schools. The attendees for these meetings were primarily women and some even took place at the home of Tanya Luna Mount’s parents.

Another important stage of a protest is developing the consciousness of individuals, in which women took a great lead. “Developing the consciousness of individuals is crucial to generating and maintaining the momentum needed for any social movement,” and Delgado Bernal knows that this was possible thanks to the commitment of women. In her article, Delgado Bernal shares the stories of several women who participated in raising consciousness through informal conversations with their peers, family and other community members. They raised consciousness in any way they could regardless of the number of people that may not have believed them. It was in this step of the process that women also used print media to raise consciousness. Tanya Luna Mount and Mita Cuaron used their families’ mimeograph machines to duplicate their informational flyers that they would distribute throughout the community. Others were somehow connected to community activists newspapers like Inside Eastside and La Raza. Those that were directly involved with the publishings of these newspapers tried writing articles on the issues they saw in the education inequities and those that did not work directly in publishing all read and encouraged others to read these newspapers. Since Tanya Luna Mount and Paula Crisostomo were both still high school students at the time, they wrote articles that specifically addressed the educational conditions they had themselves witnessed in the East L.A. schools. Developing consciousness is often not seen as big of a task normally associated with the traditional characteristics of leadership, yet it is this type of “behind the scenes” work that sets up the stage for a movement to actually come about. It takes a leader to gather a community and to get a community together for a specific cause takes the time and effort to spread consciousness, this was one of the most important roles in women leadership during the walkouts, and although it may not be recognized as such, it was the fondation for the development of the movement itself.

Sources:

Delgado Bernal, Dolores. “Grassroots Leadership Reconceptualized: Chicana Oral Histories and the 1968 East Los Angeles School Blowouts.” Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies. Vol. 19, No. 2, Varieties of Women’s Oral History (1998), pp. 113-142

Image:

http://vivirlatino.com/2006/03/27/vl-en-casa-walkout-on-hbo-fidel-on-dvd.php