The Gift of Gothic Death: Providing A Space for Commentary

In her essay “The Gothic Gift of Death in Cherríe Moraga’s The Hungry Woman: AMexican Medea”, Tanya Gonzalez constructs a case in favor of sympathy towards the version  of Madea Moraga has constructed in her play. Gonzales argues that Moraga takes the “gothicness” inherent in the La Llorona legends and employs it in a manner that can allow the reader to be sympathetic towards the horrible actions taken by Madea. According to Gonzalez, the “gothicness” of Chac-mool’s ghostly figure appearing to Madea to subsequently “take her home” has a redemptive quality for this classic character. The final scene of the play depicts Madea dead in the arms of the apparition of her diseased son. The cyclical nature these two characters’ relationship in their deaths allows for a somewhat cathartic ending, in that Madea’s monstrous actions against her son did not dissolve without some sort of moment of closure. Had Chac-mool’s ghost not returned to “bring his mother home”, it would have been much easier for the reader to see Madea’s actions as strictly manifested from jealousy and madness. The implementation of this scene taken straight from the handbook of the gothic genre, however, allows for a reading of this play that portrays Madea as a woman combatting the patriarchal construction of it means to be a mother.

The notion introduced by Gonzalez that historically, the gothic genre provides an aesthetic space for social commentary was an aspect of this essay that I found most intriguing. Having done extensive research on Shelley’s Frankenstein, the notion of the gothic providing a space for controversial critiques is also a substantial aspect of the novel. The motifs of the gothic and the sublime are interwoven throughout the novel and it is in the presence of these two motifs that the monster and Dr. Frankenstein are most able to interact and the bulk the religious and scientific commentaries can be found. Whether it be the sublime terrain of the Swiss Alps or the gothic environment of a thunderstorm, an aesthetic space is created where both characters are on level ground and the two conflicting forces of slave and master come to the fore. I found this element of freedom found in the gothic present in Moraga’s The Hungry Woman because it is through Chac-mool’s ghostly reappearance that the reader can finally begin to identify with the selfless intentions behind Madea’s horrific acts; attempting to preserve her son’s innocence to the patriarchal society constructed in Aztlan, and, more generally, make a stance against the male dominated definition of what it means to be a mother.

 

 

 

Comments

The Gift of Gothic Death: Providing A Space for Commentary — 2 Comments

  1. I think that you raise a fair point in your assessment of how Chac-Pools reappearance does a job of promoting feelings of sympathy towards Medea. Medea is a controversial character at best; she does commit infanticide in her attempts to keep her son to herself. However, I do believe that the Chac-pool’s ghost embracing her does point to redemption, as well as forgiveness from her son. Without going too nerdy, a similar motif can be noticed in the Star Wars franchise, where Darth Vader’s ghost appears to his son at the end of the third film. This is used to show that Darth Vader is at peace; in a similar manner, I believe that Chac-pool’s appearance demonstrates that he is at peace as well, and that he can embrace his mother.

  2. When i first read The Hungry Woman, I had no sympathy for Medea at all. I think this was because she came off as so selfish. You bring up some good points about how Medea can be seen as a sympathetic character in your blog post, however. The idea that Chac-mool returns to “forgive” his mother definitely gives her actions a redemptive quality. Also the idea that she killed her son in an act of defiance against the structure of patriarchy does make her pitiful. However, I still don’t view Medea as a sympathetic character. Even if she killed her son to take a stance against male domination, she was still only thinking of herself. Her son may have grown up to be a great man but she only saw him as growing up to be a terrible man. She never gave him the chance to prove himself, which was very presumptuous and selfish of her.